<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rob Glidden &#187; Digital TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robglidden.com/tag/digital-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robglidden.com</link>
	<description>My blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 01:46:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>MPEG Issues Resolution on Type-1 (Royalty-Free) Standardization</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/04/mpeg-resolution-on-royalty-free-standardization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/04/mpeg-resolution-on-royalty-free-standardization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadband Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent pool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MPEG &#8212; Working Group 11 of  ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29 &#8212; has issued a resolution seeking active participation in developing a Type-1 (royalty-free) video coding standard. &#8220;Given that there is a desire for using royalty free video coding technologies for some applications such as video distribution over the Internet, MPEG wishes to enquire of National [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/04/mpeg-resolution-on-royalty-free-standardization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gateway To Nowhere: Standards-Bashing Won&#8217;t Fix Set Top Gridlock</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/02/gateway-to-nowhere-standards-bashing-wont-fix-set-top-gridlock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/02/gateway-to-nowhere-standards-bashing-wont-fix-set-top-gridlock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadband Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Standards &#8220;would thwart, not advance, innovation&#8221; and &#8220;entail crippling delays&#8221;  because they are &#8220;extremely time consuming, often divisive, and sometimes used by one faction to block the progress of another or to promote its own intellectual property portfolio&#8221;. It would be easy to dismiss comments like these in the Cable industry&#8217;s latest response to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/02/gateway-to-nowhere-standards-bashing-wont-fix-set-top-gridlock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DTG Group Challenges Semi-Open Stance of Project Canvas</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/02/dtg-challenges-project-canvas-semi-open-stance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/02/dtg-challenges-project-canvas-semi-open-stance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBBTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Canvas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last August I questioned if the BBC-led hybrid DTV Project Canvas was &#8220;seduced by the cynical allure of a semi-open &#8216;standards-based open environment&#8216;&#8221; . Many kudos to the DTG &#8212; the lead UK DTV standards group &#8212; who today released its tough-love &#8220;parallel process&#8221; criticism in the BBC Trust oversight consultation. To wit:  &#8220;it is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/02/dtg-challenges-project-canvas-semi-open-stance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Quit – Evolve!  ATSC Forum to Close Doors</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/dont-quit-evolve-atsc-forum-to-close-doors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/dont-quit-evolve-atsc-forum-to-close-doors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATSC Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUT FATT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISDB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent pool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Business News Americas broke the story that the ATSC Forum &#8212; the industry group that lobbies for the international adoption of the US ATSC digital TV standard of the Advanced Television Systems Committee &#8212; plans to close its doors at the end of September. Although the ATSC Forum&#8217;s closure has gotten little attention [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/dont-quit-evolve-atsc-forum-to-close-doors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadcasters Challenge Broadband TV Patent Submarine Threat</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/ebu-challenges-broadband-tv-standards-patent-submarines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/ebu-challenges-broadband-tv-standards-patent-submarines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Broadband-Broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java DTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBBTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent pool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve pointed out how the EBU, the world&#8217;s largest organization of national broadcasters, is beating the drum to avoid patent lock-ins in new standards for hybrid broadcast-broadband TV services. EBU&#8217;s own write-up of last week&#8217;s EBU/ETSI workshop is even more direct: &#8220;Broadcasters are haunted by the ghosts of the submarine patents which emerged with MHP [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/ebu-challenges-broadband-tv-standards-patent-submarines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Dumping For Democracy:  Reconsidering America&#8217;s DTV Diplomacy</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/reconsidering-americas-dtv-diplomacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/reconsidering-americas-dtv-diplomacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTV Trade Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent pool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“More Democratic” &#8230; “It is a matter of social justice” So US ambassadors have lobbied South American governments since 2007 that “[t]he issue is whether the government will choose the [ATSC] digital television standard that is already providing the highest quality, lowest cost, and most democratic opportunities &#8230;” In recent months Peru, Argentina, and now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/reconsidering-americas-dtv-diplomacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Conflict Through Consensus&#8221;: Europe&#8217;s Hybrid Broadbanders Paint on UK&#8217;s Project Canvas</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/conflict-through-consensus-in-hybrid-tv-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/conflict-through-consensus-in-hybrid-tv-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadband Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBBTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Canvas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royalties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A “Julius Stonian” observation:  standards groups aren&#8217;t &#8220;consensus organizations&#8221;, they are political organizations. Winners declare their way the &#8220;consensus&#8221;, and changes in political context shift the &#8220;consensus&#8221;. So reflects calls in several slides at yesterday&#8217;s Hybrid Broadcast-Broadband (HBB) workshop to look deeper into Intellectual Property Rights and other control points in the new &#8220;broadcast+broadband&#8221; (aka [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/conflict-through-consensus-in-hybrid-tv-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hybrid TV: The Way Forward?</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/hybrid-tv-the-way-forward/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/hybrid-tv-the-way-forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the 2009 Brazil SET Broadcasting &#38; Cable Conference I presented on 3 panel topics: &#8220;DTV Patent Pools:  What&#8217;s Wrong &#38; How to Fix It&#8220; &#8220;Conformance &#38; Certification: Key to Digital Switch Over&#8220; &#8220;Hybrid TV, The Way Forward?&#8220;(pdf) The overall theme that Brazil has become a world DTV leader was picked up in the Brazil [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/hybrid-tv-the-way-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Trust But Verify&#8221;: IPR &amp; BBC&#8217;s Project Canvas</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/08/trust-but-verify-ipr-bbc-project-canvas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/08/trust-but-verify-ipr-bbc-project-canvas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadband Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Canvas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royalties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have filed comments in the UK Project Canvas public consultation.  To catch up on the UK context with global implications, watch James Murdock&#8217;s mesmerizing anti-BBC screed, and say&#8230; “This is the BBC.” Perhaps no other single phrase has broadcast more meaning to more people in the great call to communicate that has gripped our [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/08/trust-but-verify-ipr-bbc-project-canvas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the Sad State of Interactive TV Matters and What to Do About It</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/03/fix-the-sorry-state-of-interactive-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/03/fix-the-sorry-state-of-interactive-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would the Internet look like today if history had been just slightly different? Say for example the Internet&#8217;s open, royalty-free foundation &#8212; protocols, HTML, etc. &#8212; hadn&#8217;t mostly won out? Leaving only proprietary solutions or shifting interest groups (and their designates) maneuvering to disadvantage, overcharge, or end-run each other as the only &#8212; and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/03/fix-the-sorry-state-of-interactive-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
