<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rob Glidden &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robglidden.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robglidden.com</link>
	<description>My blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 21:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It Is Time to Standardize a Royalty-Free Video Codec</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2011/01/time-to-standardize-a-royalty-free-video-codec/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2011/01/time-to-standardize-a-royalty-free-video-codec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadband Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Pools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been saying for a while that the best way out of the Web video codec mess is formal standardization of a royalty-free video codec and that formal standards groups like MPEG and others should step up to the task. Of course, I mean a real, bona-fide standardization process, not a dubious rubber-stamping &#8220;ratification&#8221; nor [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2011/01/time-to-standardize-a-royalty-free-video-codec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Problem or Opportunity? Steve Jobs on Standardizing Royalty Free Codecs</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/06/problem-or-opportunity-steve-jobs-on-standardizing-royalty-free-codecs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/06/problem-or-opportunity-steve-jobs-on-standardizing-royalty-free-codecs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royalty free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VP8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As readers of this blog know, I am a long-time proponent of royalty-free standardization as the best option for open Web media, preferable to informal, vendor-run open-sourcing of undocumented or unreviewed Intellectual Property Rights. MPEG, an ISO working group (WG 11 of ISO/IEC JTC 1 / SC 29, to be precise), has been looking into [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/06/problem-or-opportunity-steve-jobs-on-standardizing-royalty-free-codecs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Google&#8217;s Open Sourcing of VP8 Harms the Open Web</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/05/how-googles-open-sourcing-of-vp8-harms-the-open-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/05/how-googles-open-sourcing-of-vp8-harms-the-open-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 00:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMS Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent pool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VP8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much of the initial commentary on Google&#8217;s open sourcing of the VP8 codec it acquired in purchasing On2 has breathlessly, and uncritically, centered on the purported game-changing impact of the move. But unfortunately, these commentaries miss an essential point that Google has studiously avoided mentioning the need to standardize royalty free codecs (not just release [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/05/how-googles-open-sourcing-of-vp8-harms-the-open-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DTG Group Challenges Semi-Open Stance of Project Canvas</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/02/dtg-challenges-project-canvas-semi-open-stance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/02/dtg-challenges-project-canvas-semi-open-stance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBBTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Canvas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last August I questioned if the BBC-led hybrid DTV Project Canvas was &#8220;seduced by the cynical allure of a semi-open &#8216;standards-based open environment&#8216;&#8221; . Many kudos to the DTG &#8212; the lead UK DTV standards group &#8212; who today released its tough-love &#8220;parallel process&#8221; criticism in the BBC Trust oversight consultation. To wit:  &#8220;it is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2010/02/dtg-challenges-project-canvas-semi-open-stance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Royalty free codec standards &#8212; don&#8217;t settle for less</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/12/royalty-free-codec-standards-dont-settle-for-less/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/12/royalty-free-codec-standards-dont-settle-for-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadband Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMS Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPEG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a lively debate, the IETF appears to be moving forward with a royalty-free audio codec standardization activity.  Here&#8217;s to its successful launch and positive outcome. I&#8217;ve put a brief summary at the mpegrf.com site, and there is a good summary here. The group&#8217;s email discussion alias is here &#8212; and my view, expressed there [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/12/royalty-free-codec-standards-dont-settle-for-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

