<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Quit – Evolve!  ATSC Forum to Close Doors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/dont-quit-evolve-atsc-forum-to-close-doors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/dont-quit-evolve-atsc-forum-to-close-doors/</link>
	<description>My blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 22:08:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Glidden</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/dont-quit-evolve-atsc-forum-to-close-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Glidden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1422#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave:

The ATSC Forum didn&#039;t lose out in South America to an informal small group of vendors presenting themselves as a broader industry interest.  In fact the opposite -- multiple high level governments involved.

Just look at the isdbt.org web site to see what I mean. DTV adoptions and digital transitions everywhere have a very strong, necessary involvement of multiple actors: government, formal industry bodies, and individual companies, and if anything in DTT digital transitions around the world the trend seems more so.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave:</p>
<p>The ATSC Forum didn&#8217;t lose out in South America to an informal small group of vendors presenting themselves as a broader industry interest.  In fact the opposite &#8212; multiple high level governments involved.</p>
<p>Just look at the isdbt.org web site to see what I mean. DTV adoptions and digital transitions everywhere have a very strong, necessary involvement of multiple actors: government, formal industry bodies, and individual companies, and if anything in DTT digital transitions around the world the trend seems more so.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.robglidden.com/2009/09/dont-quit-evolve-atsc-forum-to-close-doors/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robglidden.com/?p=1422#comment-491</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob,

How does the ATSC Forum demise match up with industry consortium efforts like Silicon Image announcement with Nokia, Samsung Electronics, Sony and Toshiba on mating CE portable/mobile HD with existing HD electronics?

Do you see a massive shift away from national (US) standards bodies in favor of de facto industry standards?  How will this impact the status of the &quot;free&quot; codec movement?

See:
http://www.cedmagazine.com/News-Big-CE-firms-link-handsets-HDTV-092909.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob,</p>
<p>How does the ATSC Forum demise match up with industry consortium efforts like Silicon Image announcement with Nokia, Samsung Electronics, Sony and Toshiba on mating CE portable/mobile HD with existing HD electronics?</p>
<p>Do you see a massive shift away from national (US) standards bodies in favor of de facto industry standards?  How will this impact the status of the &#8220;free&#8221; codec movement?</p>
<p>See:<br />
<a href="http://www.cedmagazine.com/News-Big-CE-firms-link-handsets-HDTV-092909.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.cedmagazine.com/News-Big-CE-firms-link-handsets-HDTV-092909.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
